<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cuba Amendment Voted Down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freerangelibrarian.com/2004/01/14/cuba-amendment-voted-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freerangelibrarian.com/2004/01/14/cuba-amendment-voted-down/</link>
	<description>K.G. Schneider's blog on librarianship, writing, and everything else, since 2003.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: don warner saklad</title>
		<link>http://freerangelibrarian.com/2004/01/14/cuba-amendment-voted-down/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>don warner saklad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2004 19:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freerangelibrarian.com/2004/01/14/cuba-amendment-voted-down/#comment-299</guid>
		<description>There is the imiportant matter of our North American cities' public libraries censoring their own respective current documents and recent documents. For example, our Boston Public Library departments routinely censor by denying or delaying access regardless of intellectual freedom principles, routinely censoring from staff and libraries labor unions advocates the reorganization plan for the public library. Greater public participation is kept at too long an arms reach by such censoring. Layered bureaucratic red tape could be cut with a more open approach and developing the interest and concerns of our cities' public libraries users/clientele , cities' public libraries staff and libraries labor unions advocates. Ask for your favorite cities' public libraries departmental reports on collections and services. Ask for long range planning documents our your favorite cities' public libraries.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is the imiportant matter of our North American cities&#8217; public libraries censoring their own respective current documents and recent documents. For example, our Boston Public Library departments routinely censor by denying or delaying access regardless of intellectual freedom principles, routinely censoring from staff and libraries labor unions advocates the reorganization plan for the public library. Greater public participation is kept at too long an arms reach by such censoring. Layered bureaucratic red tape could be cut with a more open approach and developing the interest and concerns of our cities&#8217; public libraries users/clientele , cities&#8217; public libraries staff and libraries labor unions advocates. Ask for your favorite cities&#8217; public libraries departmental reports on collections and services. Ask for long range planning documents our your favorite cities&#8217; public libraries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
