<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Six Apart Clarifies Licensing Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freerangelibrarian.com/2004/05/15/six-apart-clarifies-licensing-strategy-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freerangelibrarian.com/2004/05/15/six-apart-clarifies-licensing-strategy-5/</link>
	<description>K.G. Schneider's blog on librarianship, writing, and everything else, since 2003.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Shifted Librarian</title>
		<link>http://freerangelibrarian.com/2004/05/15/six-apart-clarifies-licensing-strategy-5/#comment-657</link>
		<dc:creator>The Shifted Librarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 08:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freerangelibrarian.com/2004/05/15/six-apart-clarifies-licensing-strategy-5/#comment-657</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;How Movable Type's New Licensing Affects SLS&lt;/strong&gt;

So everyone is weighing in with an opinion about the new licensing scheme for Movable Type 3.0 .
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>How Movable Type&#8217;s New Licensing Affects SLS</strong></p>
<p>So everyone is weighing in with an opinion about the new licensing scheme for Movable Type 3.0 .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiona</title>
		<link>http://freerangelibrarian.com/2004/05/15/six-apart-clarifies-licensing-strategy-5/#comment-656</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2004 18:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freerangelibrarian.com/2004/05/15/six-apart-clarifies-licensing-strategy-5/#comment-656</guid>
		<description>What a mess! I wonder if all this confusion will actually encourage a lot of MT users to stay at their current version or to switch to another blogging product. 

I have no intention of upgrading from 2.7 at this point, until all of this is resolved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a mess! I wonder if all this confusion will actually encourage a lot of MT users to stay at their current version or to switch to another blogging product. </p>
<p>I have no intention of upgrading from 2.7 at this point, until all of this is resolved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
