Scrawled beneath the boilerplate: “A beautiful manuscript whose discursive ambitiousness isn’t suitable for our editorial needs. Keep up the great work.”
Recto and verso
You were saying…
My latest Flickr pic

-
Recent Posts
Browse by month
Categories
Tags
ALA a mile down BACABI bush Castro CIL2008 cloud tests CNF creative nonfiction crowdvine david vann defragcon defragcon07 defrag07 defragcon defragcon07 defrag07 shootingonesownfoot defragcon defragcon2007 defrag07 Digital Preservation email environment essays flaming homophobia gay Gay Rights GLBT Harvey Milk Homebrew hybrid iasummit08 iasummit2008 idjits journals keating 5 LOCKSS mccain mea culpas mullets naked emperors obama ready fire aim San Francisco silly tags swift tag clouds tagging VALA-CAVAL WoGroFuBiCo WritingScribbly stuff










3 Comments
Reminds me of King’s On Writing or whatever it was called. He wrote a little bit about a comment he got just like that and how it motivated him to keep writing. I’m not even sure what “discursive ambitiousness” means, but if it means entertaining, readable, and informative, I agree.
The best kind of rejection–congratulations!
I had a friend in the poetry workshop at Iowa who was saving all her rejections, of any sort, and planned eventually, in some future, more prosperous time, to have them printed on to a piece of silk, have the silk made into a dress, and wear said dress to readings. I also went to a Halloween party to which someone came dressed as a rejection slip. It was, needless to say, a writer’s party.
Oh, thanks, Blake and Laura. I love both ideas–wearing rejection slips (I still wear slips when I wear a dress anyway–they keep me warm and make sure my dress doesn’t hike up my fanny) and the reminder about King. A teacher wrote to say it means I just need to find the right audience for the piece.
Post a Comment