<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jim Rettig&#8217;s Implementation Task Force</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freerangelibrarian.com/2007/11/10/jim-rettigs-implementation-task-force/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freerangelibrarian.com/2007/11/10/jim-rettigs-implementation-task-force/</link>
	<description>K.G. Schneider's blog on librarianship, writing, and everything else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:17:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lis.dom &#187; Blog Archive &#187; doing what we can do</title>
		<link>http://freerangelibrarian.com/2007/11/10/jim-rettigs-implementation-task-force/comment-page-1/#comment-93706</link>
		<dc:creator>lis.dom &#187; Blog Archive &#187; doing what we can do</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freerangelibrarian.com/2007/11/10/jim-rettigs-implementation-task-force/#comment-93706</guid>
		<description>[...] Defrag was, I am sure, a fascinating conference (if I had had a spare $1300 lying around somewhere, I would have gone&#8211;there was even a $140 roundtrip ticket from Billings). But I would guess that the people there were not trying to decide what books to read for story time, or how to do better outreach to the Spanish-speaking population, or how to teach people to use e-mail, or how to fit a thorough bibliographic instruction into one hour slot. That&#8217;s in no way meant as a criticism of defrag. It is meant to remind us (myself most emphatically included) that not every problem we have in libraries is a technology problem, that not everything we do can be done with technology, and that sometimes paper and markers work just fine. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Defrag was, I am sure, a fascinating conference (if I had had a spare $1300 lying around somewhere, I would have gone&#8211;there was even a $140 roundtrip ticket from Billings). But I would guess that the people there were not trying to decide what books to read for story time, or how to do better outreach to the Spanish-speaking population, or how to teach people to use e-mail, or how to fit a thorough bibliographic instruction into one hour slot. That&#8217;s in no way meant as a criticism of defrag. It is meant to remind us (myself most emphatically included) that not every problem we have in libraries is a technology problem, that not everything we do can be done with technology, and that sometimes paper and markers work just fine. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.410 seconds -->
