<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My ALA Round-up and the Top Tech Trends Fail Whale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freerangelibrarian.com/2008/07/11/my-ala-round-up-and-the-top-tech-trends-fail-whale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freerangelibrarian.com/2008/07/11/my-ala-round-up-and-the-top-tech-trends-fail-whale/</link>
	<description>K.G. Schneider's blog on librarianship, writing, and everything else, since 2003.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: K.G. Schneider</title>
		<link>http://freerangelibrarian.com/2008/07/11/my-ala-round-up-and-the-top-tech-trends-fail-whale/#comment-287605</link>
		<dc:creator>K.G. Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freerangelibrarian.com/?p=1548#comment-287605</guid>
		<description>We didn't actually do IRC, of course; it was chat via other means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We didn&#8217;t actually do IRC, of course; it was chat via other means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Hadro</title>
		<link>http://freerangelibrarian.com/2008/07/11/my-ala-round-up-and-the-top-tech-trends-fail-whale/#comment-287454</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Hadro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 03:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freerangelibrarian.com/?p=1548#comment-287454</guid>
		<description>IRC I can handle, IRC on a twelve-foot screen is a bit much for my tastes. A lot folks had criticisms of the panel, myself included, but I can't think of anyone who wouldn't agree that the content was top-notch regardless of any presentation quirks. So putting all of my tech crankiness aside, I think Andrew's suggestions are sound, and I look forward to the next TTT in whatever form it takes — I'm in full agreement with him on having "no pessimism about the future of this program."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IRC I can handle, IRC on a twelve-foot screen is a bit much for my tastes. A lot folks had criticisms of the panel, myself included, but I can&#8217;t think of anyone who wouldn&#8217;t agree that the content was top-notch regardless of any presentation quirks. So putting all of my tech crankiness aside, I think Andrew&#8217;s suggestions are sound, and I look forward to the next TTT in whatever form it takes — I&#8217;m in full agreement with him on having &#8220;no pessimism about the future of this program.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://freerangelibrarian.com/2008/07/11/my-ala-round-up-and-the-top-tech-trends-fail-whale/#comment-285863</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freerangelibrarian.com/?p=1548#comment-285863</guid>
		<description>I don' t dispute anything you say here.  Except maybe "crash and burn".  I was there, and I definitely don't think it was a write off at all.  

In fact, the  form of the session, with the giant heads that seemed to move in another time dimension, and the online chat that kept scrolling up to the top.... these things were challenging, but illustrative.   
I might be on a limb here, but the lack of seamlessness kinda gave me the impression that you all were using really front-line technology. Otherwise it would be seamless? no?  Tautological thinking, you say?  Maybe. But I thought you all were cool.  
It's way more boring to just talk about technology.   Cheers to those who actually attempt to use it.  So what it went wrong at times?
I had a professor who made us read some of the most god awful poetry you can imagine.  He said that one can learn much more from a bad poem than from a good one.  With that in mind, I enjoyed the ride!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217; t dispute anything you say here.  Except maybe &#8220;crash and burn&#8221;.  I was there, and I definitely don&#8217;t think it was a write off at all.  </p>
<p>In fact, the  form of the session, with the giant heads that seemed to move in another time dimension, and the online chat that kept scrolling up to the top&#8230;. these things were challenging, but illustrative.<br />
I might be on a limb here, but the lack of seamlessness kinda gave me the impression that you all were using really front-line technology. Otherwise it would be seamless? no?  Tautological thinking, you say?  Maybe. But I thought you all were cool.<br />
It&#8217;s way more boring to just talk about technology.   Cheers to those who actually attempt to use it.  So what it went wrong at times?<br />
I had a professor who made us read some of the most god awful poetry you can imagine.  He said that one can learn much more from a bad poem than from a good one.  With that in mind, I enjoyed the ride!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Pace</title>
		<link>http://freerangelibrarian.com/2008/07/11/my-ala-round-up-and-the-top-tech-trends-fail-whale/#comment-285843</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Pace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freerangelibrarian.com/?p=1548#comment-285843</guid>
		<description>I'm going to defend TTT a bit here.  I think it is nice for the panel to have some of the technology to blame for "not the best" TTT panel ever.

Who remembers a session using a wireless mic for the first time?  How about live internet access?  LITA has come under fire lately for not implementing enough technology into its programs and now it is coming under fire for attempting something that few other divisions would dare.  Perhaps TTT bit off more than it could chew, but who else would dare to?

Personally, I thought there was only one thing wrong with TTT this year, and it's something that Karen pointed out, too.  There were just too many people up there.  Since I am a "trendster" myself and on the distribution list, I will say that Maurice York tried (perhaps too subtly) to reduce the size of the panel.  I decided to sit this one out...few others did.  

Each member of the panel knew going in what the size of the panel was and what the technological attempts would be, so I think "The Trendsters who sit on the panel do not make decisions. They just show up." is a little bit disingenuous.  TTT goes out of its way, I think, to include the panel in the efforts of the committee.  In fact, the trendsters comment on the listserv more than the committee members do!

My vote is next time, halve the size of the committee and halve the technological effort.  There is no need to fire anyone from the panel, especially, as Karen says, now that it has better gender equity.  I remain on the panel, but have chosen to sit out now and then.  If the trendsters can't self-manage the size of the panel, then the committee members will be forced to pick and choose.

TTT has some ground to make up after this year, but it is still a popular program and the people want to hear what the panels have to say.  I have no pessimism about the future of this program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to defend TTT a bit here.  I think it is nice for the panel to have some of the technology to blame for &#8220;not the best&#8221; TTT panel ever.</p>
<p>Who remembers a session using a wireless mic for the first time?  How about live internet access?  LITA has come under fire lately for not implementing enough technology into its programs and now it is coming under fire for attempting something that few other divisions would dare.  Perhaps TTT bit off more than it could chew, but who else would dare to?</p>
<p>Personally, I thought there was only one thing wrong with TTT this year, and it&#8217;s something that Karen pointed out, too.  There were just too many people up there.  Since I am a &#8220;trendster&#8221; myself and on the distribution list, I will say that Maurice York tried (perhaps too subtly) to reduce the size of the panel.  I decided to sit this one out&#8230;few others did.  </p>
<p>Each member of the panel knew going in what the size of the panel was and what the technological attempts would be, so I think &#8220;The Trendsters who sit on the panel do not make decisions. They just show up.&#8221; is a little bit disingenuous.  TTT goes out of its way, I think, to include the panel in the efforts of the committee.  In fact, the trendsters comment on the listserv more than the committee members do!</p>
<p>My vote is next time, halve the size of the committee and halve the technological effort.  There is no need to fire anyone from the panel, especially, as Karen says, now that it has better gender equity.  I remain on the panel, but have chosen to sit out now and then.  If the trendsters can&#8217;t self-manage the size of the panel, then the committee members will be forced to pick and choose.</p>
<p>TTT has some ground to make up after this year, but it is still a popular program and the people want to hear what the panels have to say.  I have no pessimism about the future of this program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenley Neufeld</title>
		<link>http://freerangelibrarian.com/2008/07/11/my-ala-round-up-and-the-top-tech-trends-fail-whale/#comment-285752</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenley Neufeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freerangelibrarian.com/?p=1548#comment-285752</guid>
		<description>This year the TTT was quite a fascinating beast and I know of at least one person who walked out because they couldn't handle the chaos. Personally, I didn't walk out of the room with anything new to consider but I did feel like part of one big experiment. Having the meebo room on the back channel, rather than on the big screen, would have been a great boon for those interested in that element. The clicking sounds, darken stage, and horribly projected images, simply professional it did not make. I appreciate that you took the time to write a "from the stage" perspective. 

All criticism aside, it was simply FANTASTIC that LITA provided wifi to audience members. Whatever happens, please continue to have this available to the audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This year the TTT was quite a fascinating beast and I know of at least one person who walked out because they couldn&#8217;t handle the chaos. Personally, I didn&#8217;t walk out of the room with anything new to consider but I did feel like part of one big experiment. Having the meebo room on the back channel, rather than on the big screen, would have been a great boon for those interested in that element. The clicking sounds, darken stage, and horribly projected images, simply professional it did not make. I appreciate that you took the time to write a &#8220;from the stage&#8221; perspective. </p>
<p>All criticism aside, it was simply FANTASTIC that LITA provided wifi to audience members. Whatever happens, please continue to have this available to the audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.396 seconds -->
