Yes, LITA will have a blog! Thanks to Steve “Library Stuff” Cohen and Andrea Mercado for generously sharing the materials they developed with PLA’s Kathy Hughes to support a blog. LITA members with experience installing and configuring WordPress and Movable Type are evaluating these products for use within LITA.
Personally, I’m unmoved by the argument that WordPress Is Open Source–I have not drunk the KoolAid. I know many LITA members feel otherwise. But that is neither here nor there; we come to install and test Caesar, not to praise him.
As someone with over a year of blogging experience (you laugh, but that makes me at least a second-wave pioneer), I tip my hat to WordPress. WordPress includes several MT doesn’t have that are valuable for a blog with many contributors, such as the ability to invite new contributors and the built-in ability to delegate posts.
One of my complaints about Movable Type is that it wants to be in both worlds. It wants to be a commercial product, with proprietary software and commercial, fee-based licensing. But when it’s convenient, Six Apart claims Movable Type is part of a “community” that feels a little too much like “open source” in its reliance on user-contributed code and solutions except that in the end only MT owns the code and gets the payback.
Comment spam is one area where MT walks both sides of the fence. Six Apart acknowledges that comment spam is a huge problem. Six Apart even recommends using the free and excellent MT-Blacklist plugin produced by Jay Allen, who SA recently hired as Movable Type’s Product Manager. But Six Apart doesn’t help users with plugin problems for MT-Blacklist or any other plugin. Jay Allen continues to solicit donations for MT-Blacklist, and steps in to help users. Allen richly deserves compensation for this product and his support. But what I fail to understand is why the compensation is coming from the licensed end-users of Movable Type, not from Six Apart. Don’t even try asking Six Apart for help with MT-Blacklist: you will be told told they don’t support plugins. (In a similar vein, I was very excited about dynamic publishing, since my blog’s rebuilding time takes longer and longer as it grows, until I discovered that I had trouble implementing popular plugins because dynamic publishing conflicts with their operation. It would have been nice if Six Apart had made that clearer, since it touts both its own products and the plugins that extend them.)
Finally, Six Apart doesn’t have much communication among its own products. I used the Movable Type support function to ask how many users were supported by Typepad, and was told to ask Typepad. However (and this underscores the strange but true phenomonon that Six Apart doesn’t understand its own product, as is evident by the co-founder’s blog, not updated since February 15) the only sales contact with Typepad is through a web form that since March 2 has noted that its performance has been erratic (and which I now cannot locate). I finally set up a test blog in Typepad only to discover that though it does support multiple authors, its “Pro” blogger package is so limited in its administrative capabilities I would only recommend this product to individuals or very small groups for whom installing (or purchasing installation) of Movable Type or WordPress was out of the question.
WordPress is a product that may be around for only as long as its core developers continue to be personally interested in its survival, but it knows what side of the fence it walks. That alone may not be enough of a tipping point for selecting this product, in lieu of other decision factors, but it should count for something.
Posted on this day, other years:
- Moving SWIFTly On... - 2008
This nicely sums up my thoughts about Movable Type. I ran MT on my personal site last year and found out about the new license changes during an upgrade. I was also annoyed at the way the licensing seemed to be rather conveniently crafted to force anyone outside of a single-user to buy the product rather than use the free version.
I switched to WordPress and have been just as happy with it as I was with earlier versions of MT. If I’m going to run something where I’m my own technical support, and don’t be fooled by MT’s “support”, 99% of the time you’re still off searching message boards for fixes, I’d rather not pay for that priviledge.
As with any technology decision, I’m sure there will be much handwringing and gnashing of teeth before a choice is made.
And if WordPress tanks, it’s possible to fork the code — as has, in fact, already been done. Shelley Powers forked the 1.5 version of WordPress to create her own WordForm.
I’d offer help with WordPress, but I must sheepishly confess to not having upgraded to 1.5 yet owing to extreme lack of time.
I find your comments on MT and WP interesting but they seem to be all about support and marketing issues, not with core code issues.
I started with a very early version of MT and then moved to WordPress early on in its evolution. I think both products and both support environments have good and bad points and neither is a clear winner in my mind.
True, MT is not as dyamic as WP in that it needs to be rebuilt when templates are updated but that’s a development issue and as a weblog/site matures, the days of tweaking code get further apart.
Both products suffer from comment spam. True, 6A has an identity problem about commercial vs. open source but given that the product is not all that expensive and they do provide quality online documentation and a clean and clear website, I’m not sure it’s such a downer to watch them evolve into a commercial software company.
The WP community can be back-biting, egomaniacle, and just as weird in other ways, not to mention that the back end of WP, even 1.5 is a visual abomination: disorganized, poor design, poor layout, and not fully compatible with all browsers.
Maybe the bigger question is this: how long will the popularity of personal publishing (AKA: blogging) last and might there be other content management systems out there on the web that will take the place of these two? Or, will these two evolve into huge, combersome, MS-Office like CMSs and sink to the bottom?
One thig’s for sure: the number of people now online with interesting things to say has skyrocketed and I’m glad of that. We can thank both 6 apart and Matt and the WP community for that.