Skip to content

The divides within IT

Note: thanks to a worried comment from an FRL reader, I discovered several hundred FRL readers had been marooned when I migrated to WordPress a couple of weeks ago. I pointed the feed in question to the new WordPress rss2 feed. Tell me if you aren’t reading this 😉

I felt completely back in the game in yesterday’s SEFLIN talk. It was a fun, lively, engaging, challenging group, and I was doing what I usually do, which is try to plow through about 50 percent more information than can be humanly transmitted in a presentation timeframe while hopping around and waving my arms. Plus, I was wearing my favorite blue floral skirt that I had bought at an Ann Taylor outlet in Destin for an insanely low price, no less. Can life get better?

One brief aside has stayed with me. The SEFLIN board members were talking about how staff such as programmers are “up” on technology. When I’m in presentation overdrive I’m at my most unfiltered, so I quickly observed that quite often, systems people and programmers were behind–sometimes very far behind–on social software awareness and adoption. I added what I have thought for some time, which is that LITA, the “geek” division of ALA, has lagged behind divisions such as ACRL, PLA, and RUSA in moving to online learning, podcasting, and blogging. They nodded, and I went on, but that small exchange stayed with me and resonates today.

To non-tech-types, there is one flavor of techy, much as to non-librarians we’re all the same. (Wears an apple necklace: works with kids. Cat earrings: works with adults.) Yet within LibraryLand, there are as many flavors of technology as there are librarians. There are the librarians for whom work life revolves around the inner workings of the library catalog software; there are librarians who label themselves as “geeks” even though they may never script, see a shell prompt, or twiddle with code of any kind. There are deep-into-the-OS hardware people; there are hands-on hardware types, such as Jessamyn installing Ubuntu on donated computers; there are librarians who don’t know the difference between Java and Javascript, and librarians who dream in Java. There are librarians who know the inner workings of every single social software known to the free world, and librarians who have memorized the Windows registry but think instant messaging is for little kids.

Are we one group? Are we all from the same cloth? I’d like to think so. The walls of misunderstanding are strong, but not as strong as the ties that bind.

Posted on this day, other years: