Skip to content

A9: All Your Base Are Belong to Us

Well, I see the flacks have done a good job of promoting A9 to the free world, because it’s all the yackety-yack in the biblioblogosphere, not to mention that hotbed of information theory, the Washington Post. Which is a story for another day: how innocent librarians can become less vulnerable to flacks and spin (even if journalists still fall for the bait).

Before deciding A9 is a must-use, take a close look at their privacy policy, particularly if you are an Amazon user: “PLEASE NOTE THAT A9.COM IS A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF AMAZON.COM, INC. IF YOU HAVE AN ACCOUNT ON AMAZON.COM AND AN AMAZON.COM COOKIE, INFORMATION GATHERED BY A9.COM, AS DESCRIBED IN THIS PRIVACY NOTICE, MAY BE CORRELATED WITH ANY PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION THAT AMAZON.COM HAS AND USED BY A9.COM AND AMAZON.COM TO IMPROVE THE SERVICES WE OFFER.”

Ah, now we see who benefits! You, gentle reader, get a kewl tool you can play with for a while. Amazon gets to “gather information” and “correlate” it with your “personally identifiable information.”

Please read the rest of the privacy policy. Carefully. Even if you’re comfortable with it today (and I’m not), A9 is basically telling you that when they get to be bought up by a Big Ol’ Company, whatever you do on A9 is vulnerable to more exploitation.

You can use an alternate site, http://generic.a9.com, but of course most users won’t read that far, not after A9 has been breathlessly touted by the easily excitable. (Based on its description, the alternate site might as well have a big sign on the door, “for pleasure-avoiding privacy fundamentalists only”).

For now, I’ll stick with the inconvenient world where I store my own information and use it as I–and only I–see fit. Meanwhile, I’d like to see more librarian reviews of new technology that began with a critical stance and worked backwards from there.

Posted on this day, other years: