A response I made on a recent Web4Lib thread about lists versus blogs…
———–
Web4Lib continues to be an excellent resource for me, but I have found that when I post something here, it stays here, and when I post something to my blog it grows legs and walks into what I call the biblioblogosphere, and then beyond, and in doing so picks up new readers and commenters who add value to the conversation. So I end up double-posting, or I post to my blog. Increasingly, the latter.
Donning my lii.org hat, we had a remarkable education when we added RSS feeds. Now people find us through the blog-finding agents. Librarians, including me, suck at marketing, but by adding RSS feeds, we stumbled onto a way for the audience to find us, instead of the glacially slow process of dissemination through our existing readership.
Again: web4lib: useful. Internet: changing. Implications: let’s see.
Posted on this day, other years:
- Celebrating Sanctuary - 2012
- If an ALA Councilor Fell Over in a Forest... - 2007
- MFA Spring 2006: I Fell In to a Burning Ring of Fire... - 2006
- Nat Hentoff Renounces ALA's Immroth Award - 2004
- Nat's Latest: "Carrying Fidel's water" - 2004
- Michael Gorman Replies to Hentoff - 2004
- Sandy Berman on ALA and Cuba - 2004
Free Range Conversations
Besides the excellent content, it’s fun reading Karen Schneider’s Free Range Librarian blog these days because she’s discovering the sense of community and the unexpected level of conversation you get when you blog with open comments….
D Fence!
Walt’s a bit defensive about my response to his most recent mention of RSS (on page 6) in Cites & Insights, but unfortunately he’s not really offering up a defense. I’m not really sure what to address from his vario…
D Fence!
Walt’s a bit defensive about my response to his most recent mention of RSS (on page 6) in Cites & Insights, but unfortunately he’s not really offering up a defense. I’m not really sure what to address from his vario…