Mel Gibson is featured on an ALA Read Poster. The American Library Association has clear anti-discrimination policies. We’ve known about his homophobia for years, but not taken action. Will we also tolerate his anti-Semitism?
Let’s get this “Read” poster removed from ALA’s graphics store. Mel Gibson’s example doesn’t belong on the walls of libraries. I encourage you to ask your state chapter councilor for the American Library Association to ask why ALA is selling this poster, and to lead the way to have this poster removed from ALA inventory. Either that, or let’s even up the representation and add a series of posters featuring famous bigots from all walks of life.
Posted on this day, other years:
- Survey on Blogging - 2007
- The Ithaka Report - 2007
- Someone 'Splain this to Me... - 2005
- Podcasting from OurMedia - 2005
- Podcast Test - 2005
- Blessing of the Animals - 2005
I may not be a fan of Mel Gibson’s politics, but trying to get his READ poster removed from the ALA Store just seems silly to me. There are plenty of folks whose faces adorn READ posters who have been involved in some very unsavory things. How did we weather the whole firestorm about Microsoft’s flip-flop on HB 1515 without a call to take down the Bill Gates poster? Sean Connery has certainly been involved in some incidents that don’t reflect very healthy attitudes toward women; Colin Farrell‘s un-role-model-like activities are on every file-sharing network for your downloading pleasure.
Ice Cube‘s contributions to contemporary literature include “Black Korea” from Death Certificate (1991): “Everytime I wanna go get a fuckin brew / I gotta go down to the store with the two / oriental one-penny countin motherfuckers … So don’t follow me, up and down your market / Or your little chop suey ass’ll be a target / of the nationwide boycott / Juice with the people, that’s what the boy got / So pay respect to the black fist / or we’ll burn your store, right down to a crisp / And then we’ll see ya!” [hope that doesn’t get my comment deep-sixed — please edit if you see fit, Karen]
And of course, don’t forget Britney Spears‘ wonderful demonstration of political involvement: “Honestly, I think we should just trust our president in every decision that he makes and we should just support that, you know, and be faithful in what happens.”
Now, is ALA somehow condoning or demonstrating complicity in these people’s ideas or statements by featuring them on a READ poster? I don’t buy it.
Luke, when you write that you “may not be a fan of Mel Gibson’s politics,” it feels to me like you’re writing off his bigotry as a legitimate political perspective.
It isn’t as though the guy is a some sort of whacky Libertarian, Luke- he’s a racist, homophobic bigot- and a loud, powerful one.
Were I a member of the ALA (I’m not yet), I would want his image be removed. If the ALA’s policy is as Ms. Schneider describes it, the ALA should seek to remove any association between itself and the schmuck.
Even if Luke’s “I may not agree with his politics” statement may have been a bit flippant, I’m not sure that his criticism is wrong. Is ALA explicitly endorsing the politics of each and every model it hires for its READ posters?
A Daniel come to judgment! I looked around ala.org a little bit and didn’t find any “clear anti-discrimination policies” regarding READ poster subjects.
On the one hand, selling Mel’s poster isn’t “tolerating his anti-Semitism” any more than a library who carries works by Henry Ford, John Nash, or Richard Wagner is endorsing theirs. On the other hand, I guess if it was a Mao READ poster (not that it hasn’t been tried), I’d feel more strongly. Maybe the “Save the easily offended: ban everything” approach would be best?
There’s a poll at LISNews on this if anyone’s interested.
Hm. Did I come across as “writing off” Ice Cube’s bigotry because it’s legitimate artistic expression, too?
Guess I didn’t express myself very well, then. Let’s clear that up: bigotry is inexcusable. Full stop.
Karen (sardonically, I assume) suggests that the alternative to removing this poster from ALA Graphics’ inventory would be to “even up the representation and add a series of posters featuring famous bigots from all walks of life.” What I’m suggesting is that perhaps ALA Graphics is already way ahead of her on that, accompanying their various and sundry bigots with megalomaniacs, abusers, idiots and others whose examples probably “don’t belong on the walls of libraries.” Shelves of libraries, perhaps, but not the walls.
I think a better idea would be to even up the representation by adding more public figures whose examples are actually worth emulating. I’d make some suggestions, but I’m having a hard time thinking of any that aren’t, er, equally problematic. Perhaps it’s time to turn a corner and start considering fictional characters for READ posters. Much less messy than dealing with these damn stupid human beings. I’ll start the nominations with Hello Kitty.
I think there are two reasons to keep Mel in the campaign.
1) Given his comments and behaviour, it is obvious that he certainly does need to take the poster’s advice and read widely and thoroughly. It actually looks like a command that he does so.
2)Library collections usually contain all sorts of toejam that I personally find odious, but I’d defend their right to be there to represent as wide a view as possible. The same with the poster.
If the message was “emulate in all possible ways” I would have a problem.
BTW, Luke, do you have any idea how screwed up my poor cat is trying to emulate an unrealistic, airbrushed role model? No more of Hello Kitty, I say!
Sure, I cringe when I see some of the people on these posters, but the idea is that they are endorsing us, not the other way around.
The idea of an outreach program is to “reach out” to where someone is and bring them closer. The people on the READ posters may not be role models, but they are all (at least supposed to be) “celebrities” in our society. These posters try to make use of the celebrity cult to persuade people (especially young people) to read something, anything, and just maybe try the library.
Picking fictional characters or morally good, though non-famous real people would be another campaign altogether, and probably wouldn’t be as effective with the intended market.
Good gravy. We’ve got a deeply flawed, personally conflicted, highly visible media magnet of a celebrity telling people to “READ”. And you want to give that up? That’s crazy talk!
I think is is applying flawed logic to say that libraries should keep Mel’s poster because libraries collections have lots of odious things.
I feel there is a big difference between materials a library keeps in its collection and materials that libraries use to promote themselves. The READ posters are PR. It is worth considering what a library (or the ALA) is saying about itself by not removing Mel posters.
The forces of the marketplace may send Mel Gibson “READ” posters to the “destroyed merchandise” category. If people don’t buy them any more, ALA won’t continue to pay the costs associated with keeping them in its inventory.
I’ve always thought those celebrity posters were a ridiculous idea to begin with. No one associates movie and music stars with public libraries. Britney Spears reached the top by shaking her silicone in front of millions of fans–not by whatever prop of a book she’s clutching in her poster.
I think the libraries should ban all Mel Gibson biographies too. We wouldn’t want to expose any impressionable minds to his heinous activities.