Scrawled beneath the boilerplate: “A beautiful manuscript whose discursive ambitiousness isn’t suitable for our editorial needs. Keep up the great work.”
Recto and verso
You were saying…
-
Recent Posts
Browse by month
Categories
Tags
ALA BACABI beer bigbrew California Castro CIL2008 Civic Hybrid cloud tests creative nonfiction david vann defragcon defragcon07 defrag07 defragcon defragcon07 defrag07 shootingonesownfoot Digital Preservation DocBook homebrew eg09 evergreen beer eg09 evergreen openils environment ERL09 gay Gay Rights GLBT Harvey Milk Homebrew hybrid iasummit2008 information literacy journals keating 5 LOCKSS mea culpas mullets naked emperors PIL ready fire aim San Francisco silly tags tag clouds tagging Tallahassee travel TWA VALA-CAVAL WoGroFuBiCo Writing YoutubeScribbly stuff
Reminds me of King’s On Writing or whatever it was called. He wrote a little bit about a comment he got just like that and how it motivated him to keep writing. I’m not even sure what “discursive ambitiousness” means, but if it means entertaining, readable, and informative, I agree.
The best kind of rejection–congratulations!
I had a friend in the poetry workshop at Iowa who was saving all her rejections, of any sort, and planned eventually, in some future, more prosperous time, to have them printed on to a piece of silk, have the silk made into a dress, and wear said dress to readings. I also went to a Halloween party to which someone came dressed as a rejection slip. It was, needless to say, a writer’s party.
Oh, thanks, Blake and Laura. I love both ideas–wearing rejection slips (I still wear slips when I wear a dress anyway–they keep me warm and make sure my dress doesn’t hike up my fanny) and the reminder about King. A teacher wrote to say it means I just need to find the right audience for the piece.