Skip to content

This Uppity Lesbian Is Telling You to Blame Someone Else

We’ve already heard the hints (including from Di-Fi) that gay-rights supporters helped bring down the election. Please, find other folks to blame. Yes, conservatives turned out in record numbers to vote for “values,” and yes, Republicans exploited the gay rights issues.

But two things. First, the younger electorate is overwhelmingly with us on this issue. Second, the Republicans will always find something to exploit. Look how they demolished the political career of Max Cleland. Not since Nixon have we seen such dirty tricks. Karl Rove makes Donald Segretti look like a saint.

Not only that, a lot of Democrats who personally support gay rights hung back on this issue, or even, in the case of Kerry, denied us three times. Did that convince the conservatives? Of course not. Did that galvanize the last 10% of voters who held back on Kerry because he was perceived as too opportunistic, too wooden, too (dare I say it) flip-floppy? These folks could have come out to vote for their values, but instead they stayed home. As robust as turnout was, even for Democrats, some people didn’t vote, and some of them were people whose votes we needed. (Turnout was down from 2000 in Alameda County, for example, if SFGate’s data is correct.)

If you think the electorate is truly one-minded on this issue, ask yourself how openly-gay Democrat Lupe Valdez won the race for sheriff. In Dallas. Yes, Dallas, in the heart of Bush country, now has a gay female Latina sheriff.

I would also call on other gay librarians with blogs to be more forthcoming about their own opinions and ideas (in whatever direction) on this issue. You won’t get stoned to death for speaking up. The closet’s a fine and private place, but none I think do there embrace.

California Library Measures

Overall, not so good, but a couple of wins. We need to do some electoral analysis to see what contributed to the failures.

“The voters of the Yosemite Community College District approved Measure E, so Modesto Junior College will be getting a much-needed new library as part of $326,000,000 in renovation and building projects at both MJC and Columbia College over the next several years.”

San Luis Obispo/Paso Robles: Measure L, a 1/4-cent sales tax increase meant to benefit the San Luis Obispo City-County and Paso Robles Public libraries failed, by a margin of 52% “no” to 48% “yes.” http://www.sanluisobispo.com/mld/sanluisobispotribune/living/community/10086886.htm

Altadena Library District Measure B received a “yes” vote of 77.26 % of the vote. http://rrccmain.co.la.ca.us/charts/0024/0024LIBALTB.htm

Sacramento: City voters OK tax to aid libraries http://tinyurl.com/5pcma

San Jose: With most votes counted Tuesday night, Measure S was receiving the two-thirds majority needed to pass
http://tinyurl.com/6ss93 (free registration required for San Jose Mercury
News)

Voters favor Measure B but dismiss Measure J Residents support keeping libraries upgraded but aren’t sold on a hotel and motel tax.
http://tinyurl.com/5fbml ABC Channel 30
http://tinyurl.com/5eejm (free registration required for Fresno Bee)

A, B fail; C tight
Salinas’ libraries likely to close without taxes
http://tinyurl.com/43m94

Martinez Legacy Project Failing, renovation funds for library
http://tinyurl.com/4ws55

Berkeley Measure L Losing
http://tinyurl.com/4pzed

Lemon Grove Proposition R Narrow Defeat 62% Yes, 37% No.
http://tinyurl.com/3k8lm
and
http://tinyurl.com/5r6s8 (Summary of Proposition R)

(Adapted from a posting to CALIX. Thanks, you-know-who who assembled this information!)

It’s That Day

Took me over an hour to vote–I’ve never experienced anything like it. I don’t think it’s just that I’m in a wired, upscale neighborhood. I ended up voting online, despite my skepticism, because Everyone Else Was. O.k., shame on me. Get your butt to the polls EARLY, and please vote for one of the people who will end up in the White House next January (should the courts be done by then…).

pollingplace.jpg

Vote, and Make It Count

I’m expecting that everyone reading this blog has voted or will be voting tomorrow. I’m hoping that no matter what you do, you do not vote for Ralph Nader, even if you live in California and think it’s safe to do so. Nader took Republican money in order to qualify for the ballot. He’s so marginalized the Green Party is ignoring him. Do not encourage Nader by voting for him. Cast your vote for one of the two bona fide candidates for president.

Californians: You Can Ask for a Paper Ballot

Dan Gillmor is not an alarmist, but on his E-Journal blog, he is cautioning his California readers that they are entitled to ask for a paper ballot. Gillmor ((author of “We the Media,” a great book about citizen journalism) explains he plans to vote with a paper ballot, since Santa Clara County is using an electronic voting method that does not have a “voter-verifiable paper trail.” Availability of paper ballots is information worth sharing with library users, other librarians, and poll workers. (Make it a teachable moment, and include a thirty-second explanation of voter-verified voting.)

ARL Usability Webcast: Brava! Bravo!

I attended the ARL usability Webcast held October 28. Well done! Thanks to Infopeople for negotiating a low-cost price for Californians.

The webcast was conducted with a surprisingly light touch, including a few well-chosen cartoons, examples grounded in everyday librarianship (such as library doors with handles that lead users astray), and quotes such as “Know thy user, for they are not you,” and “Forget what you know, and OBSERVE.”

I came away with at least five new ideas, and with a number of old ideas reinforced. Starting with the old ideas, presenters emphasized the need for user-centered design, the value of the iterative design process, and for the concept that usability testing can be done cheaply and quickly, and yet also effectively, with somewhere between 4 to 8 “subjects” for each iteration. A presenter also encouraged us to “Guide test participant to ‘think aloud.'”

Newer ideas, or things that had rattled to the bottom of my brain pan, included the value of paper prototyping and videotaping, deeper discussions of the design work cycle (including very specific guidance for usability testing, such as “identify key tasks, create questions, create debriefing questions, create forms, train your test monitors”), ideas for engaging team members in the usability testing process, and recommendations for several good books, including Jeffrey Rubin’s book, which I bought right after I located it on the program bibliography. “Guerrilla Tactics” for fast, cheap usability testing included “Don’t schedule users–grab ’em!” plus the value of mini-tests. Presenters encouraged us not to write up interim reports but to test, fix, and test again the following week.

I enjoyed the amusing list of objections to testing and usability issues. “This will dumb down the page” is my favorite. (I have the t-shirt for that one. Early in my LII tenure, someone said that to me when I removed a confusing feature from the front of LII.)

Three small dinks for the ARL webcast. The first 12 minutes were devoted to a series of explanations and introductions; that’s over 10% of the 90 minutes allotted to this program, and got things off to a slow start. Also, the links in the Webcast weren’t clickable, and I wasn’t sure how to get to them. I went back to the ARL site and they were right there, but still. Finally, I worried that I was stuck on question 4 in the survey at the end, but it turns out that was the end of the survey–an intriguing usability problem! Maybe one more iteration would have fixed it.

The tech side of things worked great. I would teach online again if I could use something like the software ARL used, versus Blackboard (which is not an tool for facilitating education so much as a place to park correspondence course materials). I enjoyed seeing and hearing the presenters, I could ask questions by text entry (and they answered them), and I could follow the page views easily.

Great info, well-presented, and I could sit here in my office with a cup of tea (IM’ing people I know who were attending the same presentation).

Current Cites and the Big O’s Latest

http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/CurrentCites/2004/cc04.15.10.html

I really love Current Cites, freely available by e-mail and the Web. It’s scholarly, it’s funny and interesting, and it points me to resources that haven’t popped up on my radar scope.

It needs an RSS feed, and I just wrote to tell them that.

At any rate, in the latest issue, we learn that the Big O has taken a stand against the early American practice of bundling, in which courting couples would lie in bed and… no, wait, they’re talking about liberating content from its containers. Information wants to be free! Let me wiggle out of this format girdle and prance on the digital prairie, shaking my liberated content bootie! I peeked; great reading. Good work, Big O, and you folks at UC just keep cranking out them Current Cites. You-all should read it anyway, even if you have to subscribe by funky old email.

Five Minute Review: EndNote Version 8

endnote2small.gif

ISI repeatedly sent me review copies of EndNote when I wrote for American Libraries, but I only looked at this research and citation product once or twice back then. Now I find myself juggling hundreds of citations for my writing, so I downloaded the demo for version 8 from their site. I had some trepidation, because version 8 has incompatibilities with Windows XP Service Pack 2, and the patch for it won’t work on the demo download. But the only thing that crashed on installation was the Palm extension, and I do not do much data entry on my Treo. It could happen, but I doubt it.

In brief, what a joy EndNote 8 is–a qualified joy, but a joy nonetheless. I had a new “library” (Endnote collection file) set up in seconds, then quickly used the Z39.50 “Connect” tool to scoot into several major catalogs, such as MIT. I paused and restarted searches, dragged citations into my library, tweaked and buffed, reset styles, sorted references, twiddled preferences, and all in all had a bang-up time, automating references I’d had sitting in paper folders or on a flash drive for almost a year.

With journal articles, I had less success. I tried using the Connect command to access Infotrac (which I was logged in to at the time via my school connection), but it left me scratching my head, and ISI tech support wasn’t that helpful here. I think the correct answer is “forget it, unless you’re using a proxy or your school has been thoughtful enough to set up a Z39.50 connection for that database,” but the tech support person struggled with my questions.

I was able to email Infotrac articles to myself, then import them with the EndNote filter; this was not perfect (EndNote glommed a lot of the information into the Notes field), but worked better than ProQuest, which refused all attempts to be imported, even after using the filter recommended by the librarians at my school. My school doesn’t have export/download options implemented for most (if any) of the terrific suite of databases it offers, which may be part of the problem. So, assuming I stick with this product (less than $100 for the academic version), I’ll be copying and pasting citation information into my copy of EndNote. Sigh.

Cite While You Write is wonderful. Using Word 2003, I was able to add, delete, modify, annotate and otherwise have my way with a slew of citations in a mock “document.” Many format options, many tricks and tools; well done.

Despite the barriers and frustrations, nice product.

The Smooth Jazzmobile

This is for a classmate, Lori, who has written about her hatred of Smooth Jazz. Lori, get in and drive!

smoothjazztruck.jpg

Greetings from your LITA Divisional Councilor

Today and tomorrow I’m wearing my hat as LITA Divisional Councilor for the American Library Association at the fall divisional and executive board meetings of ALA. I am having a great time at this meeting, learning a lot, absorbing, sharing, seeing quite a few old friends, meeting new people. (It doesn’t hurt that the meeting hotel, the Omni Ambassador East in Chicago, is an elegant place with big fat pillows and free wi-fi.)

I am taking notes through various meetings, but rather than con-grunt them here experientially, I’ll summarize tomorrow, possibly from O’Hare as I wait to head back to the Bay Area. Right now we’re talking about core values for the association, which is more interesting than it sounds. These are distinct from core values for librarianship.

At any rate: mull over this. I’m in a room with about 100 movers and shakers from all over ALA. These are the people who determine the direction of our flagship professional association, which in turn has a powerful influence on how we perceive ourselves in this profession and how we are perceived by others. Do you see yourself in this room? And how do you get here?

And that’s your assignment for today!