Skip to content

Biscuits Twice for Christmas


Best Biscuits

Originally uploaded by freerangelibrarian

By design, because we could, we essentially had the same meal twice for Christmas.

In the morning, by popular demand, I served biscuits and sausage gravy. Then for dinner we had oyster pan roast, almost verbatim from the recipe in my Oyster Bar cookbook, except served over split toasted biscuits. (Call it Southern Pan Roast.) Both meals were complete unto themselves and utterly sublime.

I’ve carried this biscuit recipe around with me for over thirty years; it’s written in longhand in a small plaid recipe book that has traveled with me to San Francisco, New York City, England, Germany, Korea, Illinois, New Jersey, New Mexico, and Florida.

We eat very little refined flour, but Christmas is an exception. I had to force myself to give the remaining biscuits to the birds. These biscuits are worth every rich little bite!

Bon appetit —

Best Biscuits

2 cups all-purpose flour
4 teaspoons baking powder
1/2 teaspoon salt
1/2 teaspoon cream of tartar
2 teaspoons sugar
1/2 cup shortening
2/3 cup milk

Sift the dry ingredients. Cut in the shortening. Stir in the milk all at once. Knead 10-12 strokes. Roll 1/2″ thick. Bake 10-12 minutes at 450 degrees.

First Links for 2009

I ignored my reading backlog last week and glommed down Tom Piazza’s Katrina novel, City of Refuge. It was nothing short of amazing. Not an absolutely perfect book (once in a great while the characters become leaden) but still, an extraordinary book of an extraordinary time. As Miriam says in a comment on an earlier post, I am still thinking about the characters.

More juicy-juice for you:

Found by way of one of my new Facebook friends, this pro-marriage, anti-hate collection, “Please Don’t Divorce Us.”

We’re contemplating taking vacay for Inauguration Day and hosting a brunch (locals… are you interested?). But if you just want to relive the joy of election day, this collection of front pages by Poynter is pretty darn cool.

A Pew recent poll of (predominantly male) digirati pundits found that “The mobile device will be the primary connection tool to the internet for most people in the world in 2020.” This is news? Travel anywhere outside the U.S. — in many parts of the world, the cell phone is the de facto connection device.

Due to my travel/conference schedule (coming soon!), I think I’m just going to miss the BooksAlive! 2009 literary festival in Panama City this February, but if you’re around, you don’t have to.

See this great library sculpture at Pima County Public Library.

GalleyCat has produced a fabulous “year in publishing” post series.

Hey you Southern localvore writer types: Michael Pollan will be speaking at the Georgia Organics conference, which is March 20-21.

Here’s a delightful NPR story about how to bake a better cookie. The breathy explanations by the chemist/baker make it all quite worthwhile.

Computers, Freedom, and Privacy is holding its 2009 conference this June in D.C. I was irked with them for years due to their EFF connection (long story, has to do with a library director harassed for planning to implement RFID) but I’m thawing out.

This post on Twitter types isn’t half-bad in terms of explaining who you’ll find.

Unshelved takes on Free Kittens. 😉

The 2008 reading backlog


The reading backlog

Originally uploaded by freerangelibrarian

This is the backlog I’ll publicly confess to. I have other books I have quietly placed in the giveaway box, but since some of them are gifts, I’m not showing that picture.

Life is short… I’ll give these titles another try, but if these books are unread a year from now, into the giveaway box they go!

Working backwards from January 1, 2010

So, 2008 was an interesting year. I changed jobs, Sandy resigned from hers, the economy tanked, I saw some writing published, I went to many places, notably Oz, and Obama was elected.  Friends survived cancer and transplants; some had babies; some got married; some moved on.

I don’t want to put too many brackets around 2009. But one year from now, I want to be able to say that…

For my personal writing:

  • I found at least three opportunities to market Powder
  • I finished revising three essays-in-work and started three more
  • I at least muddled through to a first draft of the short story I’m writing (after that, I don’t have to write fiction ever again, if I don’t want to)
  • I kept to a schedule of ten hours per week for personal writing, plus 1 hour per week of writing administrivia, such as submissions and related work — at Chez Panera’s, if need be
  • I submitted essays to literary journals at least twice a month (the acceptances I leave up to a higher power)
  • I took at least one personal writing retreat
  • I kept up my lifelong reading habit

For my professional self:

  • I contributed 3 entries a month to Current Cites (to be a reviewer is to be a reader!)
  • I both mentored and was mentored on significant issues at least twice during the year
  • I established and led a profession-wide project (I have one in mind, more later)
  • I learned at least one new skill that would be broadly applicable to my career for the next two decades
  • I continued to have fun at My Place of Work and to be a good worker

For my physical health:

  • I doubled the “run” part of my daily exercise, currently a little over 1 mile running, 1 mile walking (up from 2 miles walking as of 1/1/2008). Hardly an Olympian workout, but it’s still 30 minutes of weight-bearing exercise that keeps the ol’ badonkadonk in tune.

For my spiritual health:

  • I found a way to connect with a faith community, even if it didn’t mean “going to church” (for example, I checked out Jacob Needleman’s book, Money and the Meaning of Life, and will try to attend half of the book group sessions on this book to be held at St John’s — I feel obligated to make the attempt, since I am hogging the only copy at the library!)

For my family life:

  • I ensured we had “just fun” time out of the house for us every week — a movie, a dinner out, a walk, or something unrelated to errands
  • I continued to support Sandy in her search for a new job, and kept us open to many possibilities
  • I visited each of my parents at least once, and made my sister laugh a few times
  • I connected at least once with every one my “family of choice” friends

For the world at large:

  • I carefully monitored my carbon footprint and my family’s carbon footprint, and took steps to reduce them
  • I participated in national dialogs about economics, social justice, and the environment
  • I reduced our consumption of factory-farmed meat and dairy down to fewer than ten portions per month (also related to the carbon footprint, of course, but also a commitment to humane food production)

For whimsy:

  • I experimented with a hobby I hadn’t thought of before
  • I learned one long, complicated joke and told it successfully
  • I made at least one very complicated dessert I had never attempted
  • I sewed us new Halloween costumes

Top Ten Words and Phrases for 2008

“I think Ford will fall apart. They have just made too many bets on the wrong things. A bunch of the institutions that we rely on currently will, to some degree, decompose.” — John Elkington of the consulting firm Sustainability,  quoted in “Big Foot,” Michael Specter, The New Yorker, 2/25/2008

This is my short list. I had to work hard not to turn this into a glossary of the downturn (staycation, stagflation, etc.).

I’m fortunate that the worst of these terms are happening around me, not to me, but I did feel very uncomfortable when I stopped by a shed store yesterday and walked through a very nice shed that turned out to be a “repo.” That’s my index of hard times: when we start seeing foreclosures on sheds.

Oh, and for phrases on the way out? I submit “flat-panel TV.” Try buying one that isn’t!

Top Ten Words and Phrases for 2008

Presearch: the informal Google/Wikipedia look-ups students do before digging into better resources  (and yes, they do that! More about that in a future post about Project Information Literacy)

Tweet: A post on the microblogging site, Twitter. (Hardly a new term, but when I saw Twitter on the front page of the New York Times, I knew it deserved a mention.)

Long photo: A very short video, possibly first defined by Flickr, but moving into general usage through the ease and popularity of creating and uploading short video commentary to sites such as YouTube and Amazon.

“Pal around”: to serve on a nonprofit board

Maverick: A Republican out of ideas

Early voting: A way to get your “I Voted” sticker up to two weeks before Election Day

Credit default swaps: The willing suspension of pecuniary disbelief (and part of the disaster of our “postmodern” financial theory, per John Lancaster’s “Melting into Air,” another great New Yorker essay)

Jingle mail: Walking away from a mortgage (the “jingle” comes from mailing the house keys to the lender)

Underwater mortgage: I didn’t even know this phrase until I did some presearch on jingle mail, but once I saw it, I knew what it meant, and that it belonged on the list: a mortgage where the borrower owes more than the house is worth.

Change: What we can finally see happening, just around the corner — if we’re willing to remember that change means none of us stay in place;  that there may be, in fact must be, sacrifices ahead for all of us; that we all have to participate in the process; and that we need to be patient. The accumulated problems of our current economic crisis are like weight gain: you didn’t put it on in a day, and you won’t take it off in a day. Have faith, be part of the solution, and hang in there.

The Amazing Power of Libraries: A Holiday Story, With Gumdrops, Even

[Note: there is absolutely no way I can improve on this message, which just came across the transom to PUBLIB, the 7,000-member discussion list for public librarians, so I’ll just shut up and let the message speak for itself. Please share — and a most joyous, and thoughtful, holiday to each and every one of you.]

[Publib] Heartwarming story of the season

John Richmond
Tue Dec 23 11:57:52 EST 2008


Sorry, no Friday humor, but just to make you feel all warm and gooey
inside, here is a true story.  I can't say that the names have been
changed, because I don't even know the name of the patron involved, or
his wife.  If you think this is gooey and warm enough to melt the
hearts of taxpaying citizens whose votes you're trying to get to
finance, say, a referendum, you have permission to claim the story as
your own, and make up any names you want.  No copyrighting,
trademarking, or anything else here.

On Thursday we held our annual staff-board Christmas (yes, we still
use that word here in the Heartland) and longevity awards luncheon.
We close from 11:30am-1:30pm.  Just outside the door to the large
meeting room where we party, a staff member had placed a small table
with a tray of different candies and nuts.  Including gumdrops (or
spicedrops, if you prefer).  Not too long after 1:30, we had
re-opened, but post-luncheon clean-up was still underway.

Two elderly, semi-frail gentlemen on their way out of the library
stopped, looked at the table of stuff that is bad for one's teeth and
waistline, and helped themselves to what, theoretically, was not
theirs, but who cares, it's the *holidays*, etc.  One of the men asked
me if he could have some of the gum/spicedrops to take home to his
wife, as "she just loves those spicedrops."  Not your everyday
question, but someone found a container of some sort and dropped drops
into said container.  I believe that the man borrowed a bit of
chocolate, too, and the two men left.  The man who asked for the
gum/spicedrops did mention that it was hard for his wife to get out
and about.

Yesterday he came back and went to circ to check something out.  He
stood around for awhile, visiting with the circ manager and whoever
else was there, lingering longer than one might ordinarily linger, and
finally--the truth came out.  He wondered if we had any more of those
gum/spice drops, because his wife was so happy to get them.  Circ
manager, thinking quickly--once she knew what was up--said, "Don't
worry.  We will *get* you some more gum drops."  The man left.  Last
night circ mgr bought a bag of gum/spicedrops.  She telephoned the
patron's home this morning, the wife answered, and circ mgr said, "We
have a delivery for you."  The woman sounded amazed and/or confused,
but said fine.

So the circ mgr went with two other staff members and delivered the
bag of gum/spicedrops, sang a Christmas carol, and visited for about
half an hour.  Turns out that the woman is on oxygen 24/7 and is
practically confined to home.  There are three children and their
families, but they're all far away, and the elderly couple is going to
be alone for Christmas.

The funny thing is that, after five-plus years of talking about
delivery to the homebound, we're finally taking steps to work on such
a project...but our first delivery was a bag of candy to an elderly
couple, home alone.

I give staff credit for, as they say in Jargon, Excellent Customer
Service (ECS--wonder why we, who love acronyms and initialisms, don't
speak of ECS...or maybe we do, and I've just been oblivious).

Happy HOLIDAYS,

John Richmond, Director
Alpha Park Public Library District
3527 So. Airport Road
Bartonville, IL 61607

Seeing Milk

Milk Movie Poster

Milk Movie Poster

I wonder if years from now I will be more taken with where I saw Milk — in a weary, mostly empty theater in Tallahassee, sitting amid a small clutch of Southern gays and liberals (going at least by their Birkenstocks and hybrid cars) — than that I saw it at all.

Milk is a strong biopic, respectfully (but not too respectfully) crafted. Because I grew up in San Francisco and lived in the Castro district in in the late 1970s, a place and time where most of the movie takes place, and because I was at least a bystander for some of the public events, and knew what the principals looked like and in some cases how they spoke and moved, I have a standard for “being there” few movies could hope to match.

Yet Milk not only met and often exceeded my expectations but moved beyond the usual biopic you-are-there territory, doing justice to the idea of a portrait as a reflection of us all.

Sean Penn is distinctly Harvey, all geeky elbows and mobile, comical face (I have a poster of Harvey in a clown costume, a role he loved and a job he sometimes held). It is a remarkable performance, one which proves the phrase, “he disappeared into his role,” and if Penn does not get an Oscar, I give up on the Academy for good.

Scott Smith was off-stage to me by the time I moved to the Castro, so I accepted James Franco without question; he certainly evolves well from a gay hippie sprite to a sadder, wiser ex-lover tired of playing second fiddle to Milk’s political cravings.  However, though Emile Hirsch captures Cleve’s mop-top and puckish face, and the right words came out of Hirsch’s mouth, with all that skipping and arm-flopping, Hirsch is far more gamine than Cleve Jones as I remember him from that era, with all apologies for the rough red pen of memory. (Perhaps, among an movie-set army of Castro Clones, Cleve was recreated as the token twink.) Still, it is a brave person who agrees to have his fashion choices from the 1970s recreated with unnerving fidelity, and Hirsch’s impossibly-large glasses and tight tees were spot-on.

Alison Pill works all right for me as Ann Kronenberg, but only because she was someone I do not remember seeing close up; but I still wonder if Pill’s pudding-face captures the toughness of a biker chick who was one of very few females in a power role in the testosterone-charged gay political era of the late 1970s in San Francisco. Ann “likes women,” but is never seen with one, and when she begins working in Supervisor Milk’s office, Ann makes an unexplained shift from jeans and leather jackets to the tight sweaters and long skirts of the Mr. Goodbar era (even as Cleve is told to wear what makes him comfortable) — a point that could have been played out a beat longer, with clarification. Yet Supervisor Dan White is played with unnerving fidelity by Josh Brolin, who carefully does not go over the top and just as carefully does not hog the screen, while Harvey’s boyfriend Jack Lira, played by Diego Luna, could be any politician’s uncomfortably unstable love interest.

I had hoped for more views of the Castro neighborhood itself, but that’s because I’m greedy; any more, and the focus on Harvey and crew would have been muddled by scenery. It’s remarkable how perfectly the set of Milk recreates a vibrant, sui generis neighborhood I have known incidentally since childhood and closely as a young adult, a place I go back to again and again both in the real world and in my mind. I think every important conversation I had in my early twenties took place either while I was going door-to-door with my friend David on behalf of BACABI, the local campaign effort to defeat the Briggs Initiative, or sitting in Cafe Flore on Market Street, drinking then-exotic cappuchinos and watching the world strut by in its tight leather chaps.

The public events recorded in Milk proceed without any surprise for me, comprised as they are of rallies, marches, campaigns, and other crowd scenes I either participated in or had related to me second-hand the day after, often while standing at a bus stop at 18th and Castro. But the movie never dragged, absorbing me in every period detail, every tension among Harvey and his lovers, every new character arriving at just the right moment, every politically-fraught moment teased out on the screen for just long enough and no longer.

A meeting between Harvey and John Briggs in an abandoned lot — where Briggs refuses to shakes Harvey’s hand, and Harvey continues negotiating without losing a beat — was both new history to me and proof of Harvey’s surreal ability to set aside anger and see opportunity, as he commits Briggs to debates that though they appeared on Briggs-friendly ground had the opposite effect statewide.

(The audience was still as a winter night in a scene where Harvey fumes that the proposed “No on 6” campaign material doesn’t once mention the word “gay.” ‘Not frightening the horses’ was the failed strategy of California’s campaign to defeat Proposition 8. Some have wished Milk had debuted several weeks earlier; with no disrespect to those involved in the movie project, just mere hindsight, I have concluded Milk was a year late.)

Milk also captures beautifully how Harvey served time and again as the balm of Gilead, refocusing an angry crowd on his themes of hope and change. This was no mere parlor trick; it was a gift crucial to Harvey’s leadership, and the stirred, fuming crowds who settle down to chant and clap along with Harvey stand in for not just the determined gay body politic of that time, but the entire, and entirely malleable, human race. Harvey, as imperfect as the rest of us, had a supremely dangerous gift, and he used it nearly every time for good.

Biopics, like all good nonfiction, concoct their alchemy from the true artifacts of the known world, and must skilfully dance around not just real people and events, who often messily refuse to fit their narratives into tidy Aristotelian boxes, but the accumulated truths that occur after the biopic’s events. The headiness of 1970s gay San Francisco had its own powerful letdown in the arrival of AIDS in the early 1980s, and the movie manages to delicately hint at the future without introducing maudlin distractions. There is just the right prefiguring in the casual references to bathhouses, casual sex (which as memory serves was hardly the exclusive provenance of gay men), and, in an early scene cut sharp as a diamond, a speech from Harvey to Cleve about a life filled with many lovers and friends.

Milk concludes with a small, deeply satisfying “return,” repeating a scene from the beginning between Scott and Harvey. In the hands of someone other than Gus Van Sant (a director who in Elephant managed to make teen-killers sympathetic) the return might have been superfluous or even intrusively annoying, but when the moment arrived, I sighed with that sense of rightness and inevitability that only a good ending can bring.

Huffington Post put a spoiler alert around part of the ending of Milk, adding a “whodunit” angle to the movie that initially baffled me, given that Milk smartly begins with the fact of Harvey’s murder, ensuring that the movie’s trajectory is toward Harvey’s life, not his death.

But though uber-reviewers such as A.O. Scott assume everyone knows the finer-grained details of Harvey’s murder (a faint whisper of Pauline Kael not knowing anyone who voted for Nixon),  I will respect Huff Post’s spoiler except to say the ending has to do with Supervisor Dan White — not just what he did, but the frightening way he did it. I had forgotten that the murder of Harvey and the man my parents called “Gorgeous George” Moscone (a dapper, smart politico played beautifully and with silken restraint by Victor Garber) was a peculiar, distant event to many in my own country, though it was as close and real to me as my own hands.

I was standing in the records-room of San Francisco Juvenile Court, sorting file cards by the window, when we heard this news, and a co-worker, pleased with jackass self, said, “See, Karen, they got another one.” The next I knew, I was in my rented room and on the phone; sad, anxious hours slid by without memory, and then I was in the candlelit march from the Castro to City Hall that in Milk both stands in for the arc of Harvey’s achievement and rightly concludes the film.

A time long ago and far away; and now, with Milk, risen again, in all of its wit, hope, pain, and beauty.

Last-minute gift suggestions

(Note: I’ve weighed in over on NPR about Obama selecting Rick Warren to give the invocation at the inauguration. I disagree with Obama’s choice, but I’m still hopeful about Obama’s administration.)

Want to share the gift of my writing? Of course you do! This year I had essays appearing in The Best Creative Nonfiction Volume 2 and Powder: Writing for Women in the Ranks. You  can find these books through online booksellers and have them shipped directly.

Or why not gift someone with a righteous year-end donation in their name? I’ve had several pleas for assistance from the GLBT Historical Society in San Francisco, which helped me when I was researching an essay (not that they know me from bupkas) but more significantly was a big help to Gus van Sant and crew in the filming of Milk. What a tremendous crew they are.

But you could hardly go wrong with a charitable contribution this year — there’s so much need and so many good causes.

This holiday season, one that is quieter than many (a mostly good thing), one of the gifts I’m going to try to give — as much to myself as to others — is to follow up on people I care about… some who have recently touched base with me, some who have not. You just don’t get enough time with the people who matter to you.

Funny, my gifts these year are all about the gift of time, one way or the other. But I can’t share what they are or Santa will ask for them back!

Theme updated on this blog

I updated the VeryPlainText theme I’ve been using on this blog for a few months (switched themes, deleted the old theme, uploaded the new theme, switched back).

It looks all right, but in case you experience issues, my apologies in advance for any aesthetic or engagement harm done to FRL’s readers today. I’ll review the installation this tonight, after work.

(This is all in preparation for preparing to move to WordPress 2.7… though with WordPress releases, a good rule of thumb is “The second mouse gets the cheese,” so it may be more like 2.7.1.)

Mark Bittman’s Minimalist Kitchen

I felt awkward about posting the photo here without a way to embed it (though I was able to share it on Facebook very easily), but I shouted with delight at the photograph of Mark Bittman, the “Minimalist,” cooking away in his echt-minimal kitchen.

I have an essay I’m trying to place about preparing a Thanksgiving feast in the officers’ quarters of Osan Airbase in Korea in 1990 — a meal that with one funny twist was its own triumph. I think that kitchen was even larger than Bittman’s (the hard part was gathering the ingredients).

Bittman’s post brought back those memories, as well as others about preparing feasts under challenging circumstances: military barracks, tiny sublet kitchens, the year I decided to brine a turkey and found myself, at midnight, grappling with a large, cold, wet, bumpy-skinned bird flopping in a vat of salty water. (Next year I returned to my painless trick: buying a kosher bird.)

But Bittman’s minimalist chic is a perfect tone for our time.

I often have very bad kitchen lust. We have a surprisingly nice kitchen for a small, 1950s-era house; it’s a square room that was redone by a previous owner with black tile countertops and matching appliances, and a wonderful reddish tile floor. It’s also the largest kitchen we’ve ever shared; after a series of one-rump kitchens, two of us can be in our kitchen at the same time as long as we aren’t trying to do the same thing. The Kenmore stove (gas top, electric oven) even has one “pro” burner that can bring kettles of water to boil in a flash or stir-fry at the proper temperature.

But then I visit houses with really large, heavily-equipped kitchens — vast parking lots with huge powered islands, countertop that stretches for miles, refrigerators that could chill half of Florida’s food crop, “professional” rangetops and dual ovens — and my brain twitches with envy. That should be my kitchen! I fume to myself. That person doesn’t even cook!

Well. If Bittman can write cookbooks and a cooking column in his dinky Manhattan kitchen, then I can go back to feeling unqualified love for the kitchen we work in.

Oh, and after peeking online at Bittman’s latest edition of How To Cook Everything, call that a sale. Yesterday I bought 3-ish pounds of lamb breast on a whim; I spent less than five dollars and thought, I can make something of this.  (Even standard cuts of lamb are very inexpensive in this area, but lamb breast intrigued me.) The 2003 edition has some suggestions. The 2008 edition is even clearer, offering five basting sauces. This will be fun — even in my own minimalist kitchen.