Skip to content

How many flaps does a mudflap flap?

So Wyoming rolls out this ad campaign for libraries with the silhouette of a naked woman on a mudflap and once again I’m in a mild (very mild, custard-sans-even-vanilla) conundrum.

I can be a Totally Cool post-feminist sex-positive librarian who gets the sheer irony of the juxtaposition of traditionally sexist images with the concept of libraries (here she comes barreling down the reference aisle in her lace-up corset and do-me stilettos!), or I can be a shrill, humorless broad who asks a few questions, such as:

  1. This campaign was quickly deemed a success because librarians are talking about it. But isn’t the measurement how the general public perceives it?
  2. Does the marketing notion that no press is bad press really apply to this campaign? Everyone knows who Larry Craig is, but if I were him, I’d rather be yet another senator most people in the other 49 states couldn’t name.
  3. Is this how we see our users? All of them?
  4. Would it therefore be all right to use the same image within our profession? If this image appeared on university letterhead, or over a library timeclock, or on the front page of ALA’s website, we’d be all right with that?
  5. What exactly is Mudflap Boy reading that makes him so happy? (Brava, SJ, for my Favorite Blog Post for this year if not for all time!)

The discussion has been dubbed “Mudflap girl,” and though some have protested, that’s quite accurate, because that’s how it’s been promoted, even though this poor “girl” is too well-developed to be a youngster except in the imagination of a pedophile.

The usual rules apply. No matter how gently phrased, once women object to yet another stereotype exhumed and stuffed in their faces, they are described here and there as “upset,” “excited,” or “in a tizzy.” When men comment — and I’m very glad they do comment — they don’t get those terms applied to them, I assume because men are perceived as astute, thinking creatures, except when they’re staring at mudflaps emblazoned with nekkid ladies.

Is this the biggest issue we face today? Absolutely not. It’s a wee molecule compared to war or global warming (though we started a war over oil, and trucks are thirsty machines, so maybe all roads do lead to London). I do not lie awake worrying about issues like this; the biggest stressor this week by far was getting the AV system to work at the church for tonight’s movie (I asked God to intervene, and in walked the one person who understands that system better than anyone else).

Besides, maybe it means that we’ve finally swept away the last flotsam of the “@ Your Library” campaign, with its embarrassing message of “look at us misusing a symbol we vaguely know is related to something about computing.” (Q.v. Adam Gopnick’s wonderful essay in Through the Children’s Gate where he admits that for six months he thought “lol” meant “lots of love.” His sister IMs him that she’s getting a divorce, he responds, “lol…” Poor guy.)

Del.icio.us link of the day for September 21st

Here’s my favorite del.icio.us link for September 21st:

FSU Avoids Further Weakening GLBT Support

… FSU’s associate general counsel D. Michael Cramer asked that the student union’s policy be more in line with the university’s, which does not include sexual orientation, gender identity or expression and socio-economic status.

My bottom line is I don’t write about my former jobs unless I have positive things to say, but given the FSU-centricity of Tallahassee, this story is much broader than My Former Place Of Work (MFPOW). Yesterday (after a flurry of emails that were soon circulating city-wide) the Florida State University Student Union Board rejected a proposal from FSU’s general counsel, D. Michael Cramer, to remove protection for sexual orientation from the Student Union Board’s anti-discrimination policy.

At last week’s conference, Jan Ison quoted another librarian who once said libraries should avoid doing things that make them look stupid. Of all the things FSU had to worry about — including the budget crisis — this was a priority? Please, Cramer, you make FSU look stupid.

The Democrat covered this story — good for them! — and noted that the big school down the street (University of Florida at Gainesville, gallingly known as UF, as if there were only one, not eleven) had much stronger anti-discriminatory policies. Not noted in the story is that UF also offers its faculty domestic partner health benefits.

Giving up protections and benefits was part of the package deal of moving here, and MFPOW wasn’t worse than anywhere else in the immediate area. The state itself offers little protection (and is busy trying to Defend Marriage when it really needs to be defending public services and figuring out how to fix the budget and insurance crises).

State institutions that want to compete outside of Florida (you know… like with other ARL institutions) need to work around painfully backward state laws and policies — and these institutions are often attempting to provide equal rights and benefits in an environment that enables the D. Michael Cramers of the world to feel free to get up in front of students and propose removing protections from a nebbishly little student government policy. Doesn’t spell well for future reforms.

When locals go on and on about how “great” it is here, I need to start saying “Yes, but.” A little awareness wouldn’t hurt.

Del.icio.us link of the day for September 19th

Here’s my favorite del.icio.us link for September 19th:

A Dangerous Woman

[updated] I woke up early Saturday morning, the last day of a galvanizing good conference on the future of library catalogs (Carl Grant and Michael Norman were especially good; no, they were amazing, and Kate Sheehan of Librarything for Libraries was fabu), and tore my presentation to shreds.

My talk the previous day had been all right. Not bad, but forgettable. It wasn’t challenging or numinous or particularly memorable.

The week prior, I had so much trouble with Saturday’s talk. I knew I would be talking with library trustees. I’ve done that before, quite a bit in fact, not always successfully. So I really needed to get it together Friday night, and just couldn’t. (Just like tonight I’m supposed to be writing and should have bagged it and read books.)

Instead I fell asleep early — 9ish — and woke up at 5:30 with my hair on fire, after dramatic save-the-world dreams, and knew what I had to say.

So I deleted a few slides and added a few slides and prinked and tweaked some more, and then when it was time I got up to the dais and cleared my throat and said things I believed (though I ran the presentation from my flash drive, starting my presentation by saying “What goes to Champaign, stays in Champaign”).

I talked about predatory vendors and consultants (some are) and library staff who are resistant to change and test all software based on their comfort levels or personal needs (more than some are) and the unstable nature of the software market and the need to accept that machines can help us, especially with creating or borrowing metadata, and about the Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt some folks were spreading about open source, which I described as near-scandalous, and I used some examples from real life, including one anecdote shared by a librarian in another country who said she was told open source was only good for third-world countries, which is something I later shared with Equinox, mostly because “third-world country” is what everyone in Florida secretly thinks about Georgia, just like it’s how Georgia and Florida see Alabama and Mississippi.

I said a few more things and then I finished, and I felt good. I had been sharp and smart and funny. It wasn’t my best presentation ever, but it was well out of the trough of forgettability.

Del.icio.us link of the day for September 17th

Here’s my favorite del.icio.us link for September 17th:

Essay, “Range of Desire,” published in Nerve

I’m delighted to report that Nerve just published my essay, “Range of Desire. (No, that’s not me in the hot pants. I haven’t had a bottom like that in several decades.)

Nerve has an excellent pedigree and has published essays by people I would like to be. (I’d really like to be Steve Almond. Not only that, how wonderful that someone with his name wrote a book about candy!)

I will say that before I began looking at it for “fit” for this essay I was not likely to read Nerve, if only because I’m a little shy that way (though it’s very smart and readable). I am also not looking forward to the discussion that will inevitably take place when someone reviews my writing c.v.:

Them: So, what is “Range of Desire” about?

Me: Mumble… ah, mumble mumble. Um, guns and um, sex. Mumble. Yes, ah, er, lesbian sex. Mumble mumble mumble…

Anyway, I had another rejection today (the 9th for the essay in question) so this is a great example of one door closing and another (mumble mumble) opening.

Anyway, a good day.

Writing at Five Miles per Hour

A few lucky devils get to Be Writers, and have daily schedules neatly arranged into writing, a light lunch, and more writing, followed, I guess, by lovely evenings spent catching up on other writers’ output, whilst the house help brings you champers and oysters to keep the edge off.

But the rest of us squeeze writing into those precious few hours in life that are not assigned to rendering unto Caesar, child-rearing, cooking and cleaning, bill-paying, attending one’s preferred house of worship, untangling Christmas tree lights, or sleeping.

Those of us writing at five miles per hour have our survival methods. I have a writing friend who marches off to a lunch place nearly every day to write for forty or so minutes. I admire her; she cranks out the prose, and dang, it’s good stuff.

But it takes me at least twice that long to corral my yawing, meandering mind into its Writing Place — an exercise that requires rearranging my pencil-pots, flipping through an old, suddenly interesting book, or embarking on adventures in personal grooming (usually involving sewing-scissors and toenails). For that matter, when my brain is in its Work Place, it wants to stay there until the day is over, so the yammering begins:

Writing Brain: It was a dark and stormy night…

Work Brain: Whoa! Did I remember to list that Very New Standard in that report? Also, wasn’t I going to get a call-back from that university that deployed that Cool Tool last week?

Writing Brain: It was a dark and stormy night…

Work Brain: I wonder if I could get by with an estimate for that line item on the spreadsheet due Any Day Now to the Very Large Nonprofit?

The best the best I could hope to do on a lunch hour is open a file, squint at it, tweak a few words, and close it — and then go home and fix what I had broken because I made that change while in the Work Place, which doesn’t give two figs about narrative arcs or the rhythm of a sentence (as is all too obvious from most professional literature). So I need to find methods that carve out several hours, long enough to pull my wayward soul into the writing position and stay there for a good spell.

Some of us eke out writing time through shaving away at expected adult behavior. I’m very lucky that way. Sandy and I are at best lackadaisical housekeepers, and she’s remarkably appreciative of my whipped-together, “look-I-grilled-lamb-chops-again” meals. Frozen spinach perked up with Bay Seasoning? She’s all over that, as if I leafed the spinach and ground the spices. (I don’t grill anything when she’s away, due to a bad incident involving an expensive Porterhouse steak burned to a small, brick-like chip while I flailed away at my laptop in a moment of inspiration. It was worth the writing, but I don’t really want to burn down the house — it would be too hard to explain to Sandy.)

So my first real tip: marry well. Some writers marry really well, and don’t need huge, absorbing day-jobs, and do not let me discourage you from that solution. But if you can at least find a spouse who supports your crazy hobby — a hobby, no less, where you disappear into a room or shed or coffeehouse only to emerge hours later with very little visible output: no model railroad or neatly-lathed end-table or even coin collection to show for it — then be very, very good to that spouse, even when he or she plies you with “suggestions” for your writing or asks how soon your new story will be published.

You could stay single, but spouses are the single best source of good material, and don’t pretend that isn’t so.

Other strategies for writing in a very full life include what I am doing now, which is to get up at an insanely early time in the morning (or stay up insanely late at night, something I am not good at),  bathe your brain cells in caffeine or whatever else jolts you awake, and write. In this way, stolen hours are your “place.”

The writing getaway — whether built through space or time — is crucial.  I asked a friend who lives with his wife in a one-room apartment and has his own huge day job how he finished his lengthy, superbly-written thesis on time. He replied, “I rented an office.” He had reached a point where even Starbucks couldn’t meet his needs.

But for an amazing number of writers I know, a lot of great writing happens at Starbucks, Panera, and other coffeeshops with generous policies about how long you can nurse the stone-cold dregs of that latte you ordered two hours ago. Book-loving organizations should honor these coffeeshops for their contributions to the Letters. You also need an iPod or something like it, unless you are not easily distracted by the loud cell-phone yakker at the next table sharing his financial woes with thirty strangers or the young woman behind you who is smacking her gum.

The laptop is also the writer’s friend. How amazing it is to transport entire books-in-work to a small window table in the back of a coffeeshop across town! While I admire those writers who can fill legal pads with elegant writing, I’ve been keyboarding since I was 16 (banging away at my Sears knockoff of a Smith-Corona — lordy, I was hot stuff with that electric return!). My handwriting, once a perfect left-handed Palmer method, is barely readable in my small writing notebook, and useless for sustained text. Besides, I think best on the keyboard; I’ve never written anything by hand that didn’t get a thorough scrubbing behind the ears once it hit the shimmering white screen.

Laptops are useful for another writing strategy, shared by Terry Lewis when he spoke to the Tallahassee Writers Association last year: spousal deafness. He didn’t put it that way; he said he often wrote while he and his wife “watched television,” and he’s turned out two good mysteries that way, one of which, Conflict of Interest, is a crazy careening drive through Tallahassee through the eyes of a drunken lawyer — far better than any guide book.

For Terry’s strategy, the television acts like the getaway/coffeeshop: white noise as a fence between you and reality. It works for Terry, but I warn you: when I try this, I later learn that while in my Writing Brain, where words come out of my mouth on autopilot, I have blithely committed myself to vacations to places I don’t want to visit or household chores or projects I’ve been adroitly avoiding. Within that dangerous phrase, “Yes, dear,” I have found myself migrating church-office email accounts or, heart in my throat, driving narrow, wind-swept roads along rocky seacliffs (and I’m not sure which of the two is worse).

Writing friends are important to me, for about the same reasons people join twelve-step groups. I know writers who cannot share their work with others, but the opposite is true for me. I need someone to say what I was thinking (“That section needs to go!”) or what I was not thinking (“It’s unclear why she got in that car”), but even more than that, I need deadlines and accountability. Otherwise the bad voices take over, yammering their nasty half-truths and poisonous propaganda: no one wants to read what I’m writing; writing is pointless; I suck; or even I’m tired, I just want to go back to sleep.

But if I yield to those voices, if I do not totter to the kitchen in the dark and lean yawning on the counter while the water boils for my wake-up cuppa, and then slide into my chair, boot up, and commit myself to the written word: then I’ll be “back to sleep” for the rest of my life, because it is in writing that I am fully awake. That’s why we crazy writers write.

It’s now just after seven a.m., which means that my golden writing carriage is once again turning into a pumpkin. I had other ideas to share, and perhaps I’ll share them later; if this were not a blog post, I’d set it aside for a thorough rewrite. But I think I’ll let it go, because I have this other piece I’m working on that is so close to being done, and when you are writing at five miles per hour, every downhill stretch matters.

My Top Secret Recipe for Caper-Smoked-Salmon-Tiramisu

In a couple of places I’d mentioned that in response to various surveys of librarian blogs, I’d make my own list of my top 25 “favorite” blogs.

On consideration, I won’t do any such thing, simply because I don’t have a list of 3, 25, 50, or even 100 “favorite” library blogs.

Blogs become more or less important to me for vastly different reasons, depending on my needs, whims, and mise en scene.

I read some library blogs to stay current on library technology, others for the quality of their writing, and some because other people read them. I read several library blogs because they are written by friends, and others because they are written by vendors.
There are also at least three library blogs I occasionally peek at because I’m an imperfect person and I can’t help myself… blogs I should avoid at all costs, but I sneak up on and read anyway. See, I get to be a half-century old and I’m still 11 in some respects.

Finally are all those blogs I read that are not “library” blogs — blogs about Florida, or writing, or food (or sometimes all three) — though I wish more librarians read them.

The other problem is that, in truth, I have trouble with “favorite” lists. I have read so many great books in my life that the best I might do is list my five least favorite; however, loathing James Fenimore Cooper is not even original. (You might be more interested in my take on Who Moved My Cheese, which I find appalling anti-worker propaganda garbed in “pro-change” rhetoric.)

I have the same inability to narrow my “favorites” in regard to movies, dog breeds, or roses. The one exception I can think of is color. I love any color, as long as it’s green. Yet another birthday idea was jettisoned when KitchenAid advised me that they no longer make the Artisan mixer in empire green. I finally get to a point in my life when I am ready to buy a stand mixer, and I can’t get the color I want. I have news for you, KitchenAid: you can’t make me buy the wrong color. I’ll stick with my brave little hand mixer purchased lo these decades ago in some far-away Air Force Base Exchange, hours after its aged predecessor hiccuped, passed dark gas, and died.

Anyhoo. I don’t begrudge anyone a survey on anything. Meredith’s survey has the advantage of asking non-bloggers what blogs they read (though that has its own quantitative problems — to start with, potential respondents have to read her blog or a blog linking to it — which, take note, I have done in this post).

But in the end, though I like capers, smoked salmon, and tiramisu, I won’t claim I like them mixed together. Those are the three foods that came to mind right now, but tomorrow, that might change, depending on where I am and what I hunger for — and if I only had these three foods to enjoy, I’d get tired of them mighty quickly.

Third Place, Again

In 1990 I placed third in a lip sync contest at Suwon Airbase, Korea, for my performance of “You’re So Vain.” I do a pretty good Carly Simon (though top place went to a trio in drag who sang Supremes songs, and they were great).

So now I’m tied for third place with my real-world pal Librarian in Black in an “objective” evaluation of the top 25 librarian bloggers.

Based on the criteria, I would believe it if I were on the top 20 list, or even low on a top 10, but tied for third? I question that, particularly with some of the blogs that were left off… in several cases, because they weren’t listed in DMOZ, which is to the Web as ditto machines are to print on demand.

I’m not being coy; as Jessamyn makes clear, the issue is blog longevity. Among popular blogs, the blogs that have been popular the longest will have the most links and subscribers. (Also, using Bloglines for a measurement is probably not a bad yardstick, used relatively, but note that Feedburner says I have 3500 subscribers… a much different story than the survey reports.) I haven’t been around as long (and I haven’t posted as frequently) as some of the bloggers who aren’t on this list.

The survey also didn’t evaluate current traffic. In terms of raw web statistics, I had over 2.5 million page views last year and already have close to 3 million this year, at least as Dreamhost reports it. What does that mean? Without comparing it to other blogs, I have no idea, though I strongly suspect lil’ spammers had a role in that data.

In any event, this is all about popularity–which is not the same as quality and value. So when it’s not a weeknight, I’ll post a list of my own “top 25 library blogs.”