This past week we had a visitor in the library who (completely without guile) commented that the library felt very dated and dowdy. He didn’t use the word “dowdy,” but it hung in the air nonetheless, while I shrank in my seat.
I had just finished bragging about how much space we had opened up by eliminating all the unbolted, unbraced shelving on the main level, and how we had a cool writing studio and a new education curriculum section and some new couches and easy chairs and rolling whiteboards with trim that match the furniture in the writing studio, plus all the art exhibited around the library, and the scary metal desks on the lower level had been replaced with serviceable hand-me-down wooden desks, and for heaven’s sake, since he last saw the place every wall had been painted…
So I gulped a bit, but had to agree. My spectacles had been re-adjusted to the correct prescription: the library is dated and dowdy. What was a smart-looking library in 1958 became, after more than five decades without a renovation, that house where the realtor keeps reiterating how cute it is, with great potential.
It was as if I had rocketed back in time to my arrival, three years ago, when I thought, my goodness, that library needs help — and no one disagreed with me, and in fact pointed out that it was my job to address this. Because if you have seen attractive, well-updated libraries, you would not place this library in that category. If pushed, you would agree it has a beautiful arched ceiling and tremendous daylighting, plus a great sense of space on the main level. And it is clean and well-maintained; in poetic terms, it is no longer quite so Theodore Roethke, and even has a dash of Billy Collins.
But my visitor did me a great favor, as I reflected earlier this afternoon, when the clouds pushed north of our freshly-washed city and brilliant late autumn light bathed our neighborhood. I stood on our deck visiting my six rosebushes, inspecting for damage and enjoying the last buds of autumn. The storm had pelted many of the buds into sagging brown clumps of matter at the end of rain-lush branches, but several flowers hung in there gamely, doing their best to unfold.
Rather than cut these buds to bring into the house, I admired them in situ so they would die a natural death and let the bushes form hips, the fruit of the plant. From spring to early fall, the trick to abundant flora is to cut rose blooms early and often enough that hips do not form; but by late fall, a kind and thoughtful gardener allows her roses to consider their work done for the year and go dormant until spring (which around these parts is February–a rather short nap).
The last buds of autumn are not the prettiest flowers. They are smaller, pinched from the cold, and bruised by rain; often — using the delightful language of rosarians — they develop “confused centers,” in which petals and stamens are jumbled together pell-mell rather than whorling outward with that lovely mathematical logic found in flowering plants.
Defending these buds as representative of the best of my garden is pointless. If these wizened gnomes were what roses looked like year-round, I wouldn’t bother. I have grown truly grand roses, in which buds big as a lumberjack’s thumb unfurled with triumph, their immaculate petals sheened with color, the flowers, at full bloom, big as my fully-flexed hand, their fragrance a seductive force-field. I also grow miniature roses, whose proportionate beauty, at their peak, is even more astonishing for their minute scale. These experiences are why I bother growing anything as fussy as a rose in a setting as challenging as a wind-swept deck. (I have bought, grown, and given away roses at least ten times in the last thirty years, always in less-than-desirable locations — too shady, small, cold, hot, windy, humid, or dry.)
My love for the last buds of autumn is strong and deep. In their improbable appearance in the sturm und drang of fall-to-winter, their pluck and their lust for life are inspirational. My challenge — and my responsibility — is to remember what a truly great rose looks like, and to accept that the last buds of autumn, however much I love them, live primarily as commas between the truly grand flowers that came before them, and the amazing flowers yet to be.
Posted on this day, other years:
- The wisdom of each age - 2007
- Alice in Academia - 2006
- Merriam Online Dictionary - 2005
- Code4Lib 2006! - 2005
- Ooh la la Leslie! - 2005
- Google Book Search on Open Source Radio - 2005
- Can We Stay Abreast of this Situation? - 2004
- "The Librarian": Reviewers Wanted - 2004
- ALA Swiftly Denounces Proposed Book GLBT Book Ban - 2004
- God is Still Speaking; NBC and CBS are Mum - 2004
Well, once again, you have proved what an excellent writer you are.
The connections between the two concepts (roses, the library) are not what many would make.
At the same time (intentionally or not) you reminded me of the end of summer at the shore (Nantucket, Cape Cod, the Rhode Island shore) where the wild roses form rose hips which at first are green, then ripen through orange to red. On Nantucket and the Cape, some collect the hips and make them into a wonderful jelly.
Of course, in the early summer, the rambling wild rose bushes which often cover the dunes and line the paths to the beach, again flower and line the path with the bright spots of pink/red among the green foliage.
You brought back to me some wonderful memories of days on the seashore. Thanks.
Sometimes, I think the world needs more dowdy places. They can be comforting. I say this from the vantage point of a library two years past a complete renovation– I still miss my old worn linoleum, and no that in just a few years the “new” stuff will look dated. If everything looked like up-to-the-minute Ikea, the world would be boring. Embrace the dowdy!
A traditional library setting may seem ‘dowdy’ to some. However, I agree that that look has its own comfortable and charming draw. Not everything should like chic and modern. It is the old-fashioned and understated that often stands the test of time.